Ok, now if I am like most people out there reading
all these articles, then I am sick and tired of the
Charizard/Venusaur/Blastoise debate. Obviously, they all have their respective
uses. Blastoise works well for a raindance. Venusaur works well with Pokemon
Center/Stall decks, as well as Making sure a gust of wind doesnt ruin your
whole pokemon. And Charizard is good for those games between little kids on
the corner where strategy doesnt matter, just strong pokemon.
Is any one of these uses more important then
another? No. They are just different. There are so many different decks out
there, saying Blastoise is the best because "He works well in
raindance" just doesnt cut it. I would give much more respect to a deck
that uses Charizard effectively (I have yet to see one) then to a boring
Raindance that takes no thought in making the deck. Oh, and by the way, Double
Colorless energy doesnt count as 2 fire for charizard. So dont think DCE will
help a charizard deck in any way.
In my opinion, all 3 of these cards aren't that
great. So why all the debate? Why isnt there more debates on the effectiveness
of Ninetails/Gyarados/Kadabra? They are all good cards too!
Ok, I know people are going to see this and go
"Oh, great, another person writing a Charizard/Venusaur/Blastoise
review" and grudgingly read it to see what the latest nonsense argument
in the great debate is... well, I just wanted to throw my point out there, and
tell people to stop worrying about it. Does it really matter which card is
Of course not.