Hey...Aerodacty13...I read your article and thought I
was going to bust a gut laughing. All it proves is
that you can say any card is "better" than another if
you define your criteria just right.

As an example, let's compare Gyarados to Cloyster:

1) Energy needed for first attack:

Gyarados: 3
Cloyster: 2

Naturally Cloyster is better, because it can attack
one turn earlier. 0-1

2) Retreat cost:

Gyarados: 3
Cloyster: 2

Hey! What do you know! Cloyster is better again! 0-2

3) Energy needed for second attack:

Gyarados: 4
Cloyster: 2

Cloyster wins AGAIN! Amazing! 0-3

So you can clearly see that Cloyster is a much better
Pokemon than Gyarados...

*laugh* Okay, I admit of course that this is a load of
Tauros dung. And I'm not saying that Gyarados is bad
by any means. But do you see my point? It's easy to
compare one card to another and say "oh, look, this
one is better!" Let me now reiterate something that I
have been trying to drill through everybody's head for
some time now:

THERE IS NO BEST POKEMON.

What did you say?

THERE IS NO BEST POKEMON.

What's that again?

THERE IS NO BEST POKEMON.

Huh?

*SLAP* *SLAP SLAP SLAP* *SLAP SLAPPITY SLAP SLAP*

Thank you. Move along, folks. There's nothing more to
see here.

Remember, kiddies...send fan mail, hate mail, and
mail-order vulpixes to:

Your favorite tree-hugging hippie liberal deck mech
Spike@pojo.com





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com