>To Whom it may concern,
>
>This e-mail is about popular decks such as Haymakers, Rain Dance's, and
>Stall decks.
>  These decks are calles "bad decks" because they aren't very original.
>That's crap.  A Haymaker is not ONE kind of deck. I have seen literally
>hundred's of Haymakers and not one of them has been identical to another.
>Every Rain Dance has plays Blastoise, But what about Pokemon other tha
>Blastoise?  I have a rain dance deck but i call it original because I have
>put in Golducks to make it work as a denial deck as well.
>  My point is, the deck strategy and concept is the same, but the cards in
> the deck are different.
>  With Haymkers and Rain Dancers and stalls, you have a main strategy. But
> you also have other strategy's and other card combinations that you use.
> (e.g. use potion's with Chansey, use energy removal with your Haymaker)
>  Think about it.  How many decks do you have? Are any of them Haymaker,
> Rain Dance, or Stall?  Have you tried to think of a totally new deck strategy?
>  I have, and it's posted in the TCG Strategies section of PoJo. This is
> one of the few COMPLETLY NEW deck strategy's I have seen.
>(don't get me wrong, i'm not trying to brag)
>
>  In conclusion, i would have to say that people hate these decks because
> they do well.  Everyone hates the best football team, everyone hates the
> best hockey team etc.
>
>
>thanx 4 listening
>
>Jester