Pojo's Cardfight!! Vanguard news, tips, strategies and more! | |||||
Pojo's Cardfight Vanguard Site
This Space |
Saikyo Cardfighter R
What’s Wrong With Altmile/Thing Saver
Saikyo would rather just run a reasonably pure
Seekers deck.
There’s been a glut recently of people incorporating ideas that probably
sounded better on paper regarding Royal Paladins.
Having looked through the Pojo Forums and taking it up with some people I
trusted to be sensible (not anyone FROM Pojo, in case you’re
wondering), I have come to the conclusion that the only
reason people incorporate the most random shit in Royal
Paladins is simply because they can.
Altmile/Thing Saver craze is sweeping the nation. Those of us who thought
about it carefully however have basically filed it under the
Thing/Abyss file; it’s a good-sounding idea that’s merely
average on paper. It’s only doing well incidentally because
it is literally fucking everywhere. Of course it’s got a
better chance of reaching a top-spot.
I imagine the first person to build such a deck didn’t really take into
context what has to be given up in order to try and
hybridise these two ideas together. Altmile as far as a
fail-con to Thing Saver goes is rather lacking. Fair enough,
power is not unwelcome. But rather notably, Altmile is not a
Seeker and thus anything good that needs a Seeker Vanguard
to function (or needs something in Legion) will sit on its
ass doing nothing. No popping with Blaster Blade Seeker. No
Gildas. Just boring-ass vanilla. Instead, it relies on
Stride to get anything important done and locks itself into
one pattern.
Talking of Gildas, I don’t see the attraction to Swordmy replacing your
stuff either. Actually that’s a lie; I do understand and
think it’s fucking stupid. Swordmy is supposed to summon a
new rear-guard easy in Early Game or sometime after, but to
be honest it sort of falls a bit flat. I understand sort of
how it works; Knight of Twin Sword chain to replace an
entire column to make another attack, but I don’t approve of
losing good cards for a card that’s less amazing. At least
compared to whatever else you could run instead.
Swordmy is Especial Counterblast restricted. So unless you damage check a
Jewel Knight Trigger or your 7 (I assume so) other Jewel
Knights Swordmy would be unusable Early Game. Running a card
which then in turn requires losing a valuable G1 slot for a
vanilla booster just makes the deck more rigid in design. I
could dissect every argument for Swordmy on request. Here:
rush? Well if that’s what you want, pure Seekers has Cynric
who can then Swiss-Army as a booster later. Toolboxing? You
have Bravogal Seeker and Gildas. Not to mention a retire
option that I’m all for milking to its fullest like an
over-stuffed cow. Splashability? What does that matter if an
archetype-restricted card can do the job better?
Shellie ruins it for me. If there was a Jewel Knight booster that served
a purpose besides being a booster this may have merit, but
for now it’s just dragging all the good stuff down to
support what is not a very interesting card.
I think this craze over this deck is simply down to a bunch of people
realising they didn’t HAVE to run pure Seekers to
function…and deliberately went out of their way to not do so
not realising that sticking to what they know is probably
the wiser option. This is annoying because I cannot name a
reason not to run pure Seekers and still include the G-Units
as options as well.
Alfred/Thing Saver has no debilitating fail-con unlike Altmile/Thing
Saver. Alfred/Thing Saver isn’t dependant on taking one path
to succeed and most importantly neither path encroaches on
the other, unlike Altmile/Thing Saver. Alfred/Thing Saver
does not necessitate vanilla-ising some of the deck to
support crap, unlike Altmile/Thing Saver. It’s just a result
of people trying too hard to be clever and no-one thought to
call them out until now.
On top of this, I can’t really think of any trick an Altmile/Thing Saver
deck can pull that an Alfred/Thing Saver deck could not also
do with similar cards or perhaps in some cases with more
meaningful results. Proudroar Lion to Knight of Fragment;
Proudroar wins for not being Gen Break 1 restricted. Gildas
to Swordmy; Gildas plays nicer with Thing Saver if the
field’s bad and doesn’t need a bland Grade 1 to not suck.
Blaster Blade Seeker to Knight of Twin Sword (I know they
work differently, but I’d rather fuck up something
problematic than call a board): Blaster Blade Seeker wins
because of a better quality +1 and also not being Gen Break
1 either.
I guess you could call this article more of a follow-up to my article on
trying to do everything badly, but the point I’m trying to
make here is that you shouldn’t follow the crowd. Ideas
should be examined based on merit, not the person putting it
forward. But who the fuck am I kidding. I guess I should
just take this as a few more cardfighters I can hunt for
sport.
Sing the praises of Starlight Violinist instead to
me instead at
saikyocardfighter@outlook.com
|
||||
Copyright© 1998-2015 pojo.com This site is not sponsored, endorsed, or otherwise affiliated with any of the companies or products featured on this site. This is not an Official Site. |