Flygon
– Dragon Majesty
Date Reviewed:
October 24, 2018
Ratings Summary:
Standard: 1.88
Expanded: 1.67
Limited: 3.00
Ratings are based on a 1 to 5 scale. 1 is horrible. 3 is average. 5 is great.
Reviews Below:
Flygon (DRM 39) flies into the meta from the Dragon Majesty expansion set. This Stage 2 Dragon Pokemon has an ability and an attack. Dragon Guard prevents all effects of your opponent’s attacks, except damage, done to your Dragon Pokémon. Its attack, Sand Tomb, costs three energy attachments (2 Fighting and a Colorless), does 110 damage, and prohibits your opponent’s active Pokemon from retreating during the following turn. If you caught my statistical analysis on attacks done since the beginning of the new Standard format, you’ll know that attacks carried special conditions only a little more than 5% of all attacks carried an effect that included a special condition. Moreover, Flygon is a Stage 2, so it’s going to take it at least a couple of turns to get into play… and when it does, it doesn’t remove any existing special conditions either. And again if you read my article, you know that 110 damage is pretty mediocre in today’s meta. To frame 110 damage, look at it like this: 334 of the 1,004 attacks I recorded (33%) did more than 110 damage to the active Pokemon. Sorry Flygon, maybe if special conditions become more prevalent in the meta, but considering you only help out only Dragon Pokemon as well, this card lives in a small niche carved out from a small niche. Rating Standard: 2 out of 5 |
Otaku Flygon (Dragon Majesty 39/70) has an Ability that protects your [N] Pokémon from the effects of attacks, other than damage. Now… how many of the current, top decks rely on the effects they place upon the other player’s Pokémon through attacking? Not many, and that even includes the more pedestrian stuff like Special Conditions. It hasn’t been that long since such a thing was Standard relevant: Greninja BREAK decks, or rather the “Shadow Stitching” attack from Greninja (XY – BREAKpoint 40/122) readily spring to mind, especially as it was a deck that waxed and waned in efficacy but never entirely went away after introduction. The thing is, even if we had a metagame full of such decks, Flygon only protects [N] Pokémon and is a Stage2. The only reason it is remotely plausible is that the [N] Typing has access to two potential shortcuts, Lance [Prism Star] and the “Dragon Porter-GX” attack of Dragonite-GX. Even though some (including myself) were quite excited about these cards prior to their release, since then they haven’t shown up in any top cuts for recent, large-scale events… and while that might seem reasonable when you have 788 Masters Division players like at the recent Memphis, TN Regional Championship, the top cut I’m talking about was 77 players, so just under the top 10%. Even I have to admit I got the relevance of the new [N] support wrong, at least in the short term. Now, all hope is not lost for Flygon. It could potentially be a Stage 2 worth building a deck around, but which wasn’t quite worth it yet, so let us explore the rest of the card. 140 HP varies from “mediocre” to “adequate”, depending on the rest of the card. [Y] Weakness isn’t “safe” but it is probably one of the less dangerous ones right now. The catch is twofold; there are one or two decent [Y] Type attackers a player can splash into many decks, and more [Y] support is on the way in SM – Lost Thunder. No Resistance is typical but annoying. A Retreat Cost of [C] is good. Flygon’s “Sand Tomb” attack does 110 damage for [FFC] and prevents the Defending Pokémon from retreating during your opponent’s next turn which is… okay. Sand Tomb lacks the crazily mixed Energy cost of many [N] attackers, but the attack isn’t something to build a deck around… …which is a problem because the Ability isn’t something to build a deck around, and when you’re a Stage 2, you need to be worth building a deck around or have another, proven, in for competitive play. Flygon only has unproven (or proven to be inadequate) shortcuts meant for decks that have yet to materialize. None of the older Flygon are currently worth the effort in Expanded. There is more competition for deck space in the few decks where you could force it in, but there are several nasty non-damage effects found in competitive decks in this Format. Remember, it is treated as a non-damage effect when an attack directly places damage counters on something. Still, for both Constructed Formats, we’re left hoping for a new Flygon or Flygon-GX that proves worth the hassle. I don’t know if you’re really able to use Dragon Majesty packs for Limited Format play, but if you do and you can pull this entire Evolution line, it looks like a solid deal. Plus, the set is heavily skewed towards [N] Types. Ratings
|
aroramage Flygon: he is great. Flygon is a Stage 2 Dragon Pokemon, 140 HP, with a Fairy Weakness, no Resistance, and a Retreat Cost of 1. Dragon Guard prevents all effects of attacks that aren’t damage done to your Dragon Pokemon, while Sand Tomb is a 3-for-110 that prevents the opposing Pokemon from retreating. Needless to say, you’re running him for Dragon Guard, which gives a pretty wide range of protection. The main problems though are that you’re working around Flygon’s Stage 2 in order to get protection for your Dragons, which need to be in a deck that runs Stage 2 stuff alongside the normal stuff. Overall, deck space might just be too tight to fit him in. Flygon: he tries very hard. Rating Standard: 2.5/5 (and he gets you so far) Expanded: 2.5/5 (but in the end though…) Limited: 3/5 (he’s only going to be able to do so much for you) Arora Notealus: Flygon’s purpose is clear, just difficult to get out with all the moving parts in play. If you can get him out, though, you probably ought to win – outside of any Supporters or Items your opponent might use though. Next Time: An older way of fighting that was powerful. |
We would love more volunteers to help us with our Card of the Day reviews. If you want to share your ideas on cards with other fans, feel free to drop us an email. We’d be happy to link back to your blog / YouTube Channel / etc. 😉
Click here to read our Pokémon Card of the Day Archive. We have reviewed more than 3500 Pokemon cards over the last 17+ years!