|
|
 |
|
Pojo's Harry Potter Card of the Day
Freezing Charm - Chamber of Secrets
|
|
|
Freezing Charm |
|
Power Needed:
7 Charms |
|
Card Type:
Spell |
|
Effect:
Do 4 damage to your opponent or to a Creature of your choice.
|
|
Card No:
107 |
|
Rarity:
Common |
|
Set:
Chamber of Secrets |
|
Average Rating: 2.24
(based on 5 reviews) |
|
Ratings are based on a 1 to 5 scale
1 being the worst. 3 ... average.
5 is the highest rating. |
|
|
Aardvark
|
It's a reprint of Bluebell Flames. Yawn. Like, hardly anyone ever used that card the
first time around. Why bring back a has-been? Bewitched Snowballs and Stream of
Flames are far superior to this. They are cheaper to cast by two, and give you an
additional effect, with only one less point of delivered damage. If you are faced with
an opponent who is running a deck with a horde of smaller creatures, you are not
going to want to wait until you have the seven lessons needed to play Freezing Charm.
The opponent's creatures will get in lots of early licks on you, and the four damage
this card causes will often be overkill, given that most commonly seen creatures have
a health of three or less. Although this card is more effective against larger creatures,
many of the ones that you'd be most worried about have built-in lesson loss, so casting
two successive smaller blue damage spells would not necessarily translate into card
disadvantage for you. If your deck is designed to quickly ramp up the lesson learning,
then your best option would probably be Verdillious, which inflicts one more damage.
I'm just not that fond of this card.
Rating: 2 |
|
Crusader
|
This is a reprint of Bluebell Flames, which is a nice card. In charms deck,
this card is a killer anti creature card. You can take out most creatures
with ease, and take out the larger creatures more quickly. But, it only has
uses in Dobby's Help decks...
P.S. HAPPY 14TH BIRTHDAY TO ME ;_;
Rating: 3.5 |
|
Enraged
|
Happy b-day to Crusader everyone! Everyone sing and make merry while we make fun of the merry
Canadian =x. And on the way out make sure to give him a pinch to grow an inch (trust me he needs it).
Now down to the reviews. This card is a reprint and still how shall we say it sucks. 7 power is
to much when Stream of Flames takes out most creatures and does damage to an opponent. So play
something better than this it is just to expensive.
Rating: 1.2 |
|
FEND
|
No Review Yet
Rating: |
|
fishbob
|
This card is exactly like Bluebell Flames. Four damage for 7 power isn't
that good. Most creatures these days have 3 or less health anyway. You
should go with Stream of Flames becuase it's only one less damage AND it
does 3 damage to your opponent so it's like 6 damage for two less power.
Rating: 2.5 |
|
profpoke
|
Ah, the nostalgia... as if having 4 Bluebell Flames in your deck wasn't enough,
now you can basically have 8! But is it worth it? ... Nope, not really. It was
never a real superior card to begin with, and I think they realized that when
they reprinted it's double and made it Common instead of Uncommon. But if you
really enjoyed Bluebell Flames, then this is the card for you! :p
Rating: 2 |
|
Guest
Reviewer
stEEl_clAw |
Same as Bluebell Flames
If you’re going to play this card, go for the two more lesson costing Verdillious
so you can kill off big damage creatures like Norweigan Ridgeback. If you’re going
to go for a smaller lesson Charms deck, use Vermillious.
Rating: 2 (Guest Reviewer's ratings are not added into the average.) |
|
