|
|
|
Prize Splitting
8.05.04
OK, so you are with the
topic. Most of you reading this already know what I'm
talking about. For those of you that don't, I'm
referring to the concept of exchanging product and other
prizes in the finals of an event. Let me make it
completely clear that you can't split prizes in exchange
for a win. You just can go with an unplayed match and
the prizes and go to who they need to go to. Now, this
can lead us to a long discussion of collusion (trading
items for a win), but we are going to try and not go
there in this article. That's a whole separate debate.
Recently, the concept of prize splitting has come under
fire around the net. Some people seem to feel that there
is never a good time to prize split. I tend to think
differently. Some people aren't sure what to think. So,
we'll just look at it from a couple of different angles
and let you make your own opinion.
First of all, let's look at the "never split" camp.
Truthfully, there are a few valid points to this one.
Most of the players with this line of thought feel that
you shouldn't ever split in the finals of an event,
because you came to compete. You came to the event to
play. Why give up the prize? The truth is, if you decide
to prize split with someone to give up the invitation to
a particular event, that requires the other player to be
listed as the tournament winner. So you are outright
giving up your option to win the tournament. This is
definitely not cool. People with this mindset also feel
that it is unethical, because it is not keep the sense
and feel of competition. That's arguable, but that's
still the mindset here.
Players that tend to think that prize splitting is OK,
are those see it as completely fair. If the last two
people in the tournament feel that both players are
getting what they want, it should be OK, right? I don't
really understand why this should be a problem. There
have also been many times, that they guy taking second
place, via the prize split, was not going to be able to
use the invite to go to the main event. Why should he
play to take away the invite from the player that has
every intention on using it? That just seems selfish. In
some ways it's even rude to the other players. Many
times the guy accepting the prize split is getting some
of the cash prize in addition to the product prize, so
if you need the cash, this is a good deal as well. I
think the reason TO accept severely outweigh any reason
NOT TO accept a prize split.
For those of you trapped in the middle, I say just weigh
your options and deal with it as you see fit. If the
potential opponent has been a jerk to you and you want
to play him to teach him a lesson, that's fine. If he's
a friend and you want to see him off to the Pro Tour,
then feel free. If it's a bad matchup for you, don't
have shame in accepting the split. On the other hand, if
it's a great matchup for you, there's no shame in
playing.
With all that being said, remember that if you ever
decide to discuss a prize split, call a judge over. Let
him know that you want him to monitor your conversation
to keep you from saying something that can get you in
trouble. They way you present your offer can fall in
that fine like between prize splitting and collusion.
You don't want a potential friendly offer and plan yo
backfire against you. This would be disastrous. You want
to keep things on the level.
Also, if you offer and your opponent doesn't accept,
don't get upset. Your opponent always retains the right
to play. You obviously had the right to ask, so he
obviously has the right to decline your offer. Don't
make an offer if you aren't prepared to hear the word
"No." If you are that wired up already that someone
turning you down is going to upset you, then you
shouldn't be offering anyway. Prize splitting is almost
a gentleman's agreement type situation and it needs to
be treated as such. Just be polite, friendly, and
professional and take it from there. I do have a good
word of advice though. If you are in the finals, and you
KNOW that your opponent wants the invite as much as you
do, don't even consider talking about it or making an
offer. Only bad things will come from it. You opponent
will feel like you are trying to manipulate him or
belittle him. I've even seen some instances where one of
the players felt strong-armed. There's no need for these
types of feelings in a game.
On the other hand, if you are being propositioned,
remember that you always have the right to decline. If
you want the invite, feel free to play. Just be sure to
weigh your options. Most people are quick to ay yes or
know to a potential offer. Don't sell yourself short. If
you don't like your opponent's offer, make a counter
offer. You guys can feel free to go back and forth. It's
a friendly discussion and you are both basically making
an offer/proposal regarding a pro level event. You
should definitely take time to talk it out. If both
sides aren't content, then you should definitely head
back to the table to play. If you start to feel
uncomfortable or unsure, don't do it. However, when you
do finally come to a decision, stick with it. Don't
second guess yourself. There's nothing you can do about
it once the decision is made. Don't play the game out
for fun. Don't start playing out other scenarios in your
head. The decision is made and done, so stick with it
and be happy. After all, if you were happy with your
decision o begin with, there should be no reason to
second guess yourself.
Whether people like it or not, prize splits are part of
the game. There's no way to stop them. There's nothing
you can do about it. And honestly, if you've ever been
in the finals with a prize split offer on the line, you
understand that the offer people a possibility really
does save some time and clear things up fast. Just make
sure to do it correctly and NEVER offer prize for a win.
Again, I personally find it hard to be upset with even
the concept of prize splitting. I think it's great. If
you don't make it an option openly, people will just
make deals behind everyone else's backs. This just leads
to name calling and suspicion and there's no reason to
open up those cans of worms.
But hopefully, this clears things up for you well enough
regarding the whole situation. It's no so much about it
being right or wrong. That will be debated, regardless
for years to come. It's just a matter of lining things
up and helping players sort out the thinking involved.
This way, you, the reader, can make a well informed
decision the next time you are involved.
And so I don't leave you high and dry, here's a decklist.
After all, what good is all this information if you
can't make it to the finals. Hopefully this will help
you at your next Mirrodin Block Constructed event:
Big Red
4 Electrostatic Bolt
4 Magma Jet
4 Pulse of the Forge
2 Pyrite Spellbomb
4 Seething Song
4 Shrapnel Blast
4 Talisman of Indulgence
4 Blinkmoth Nexus
4 Darksteel Citadel
4 Great Furnace
3 Arc Slogger
4 Slith Firewalker
3 Furnace Dragon
2 Beacon of Destruction
11 Mountain
Sideboard:
2 Flamebreak
1 Furnace Dragon
4 Molten Rain
4 Shatter
4 Slith Firewalker
Until next time,
DeQuan Watson
a.k.a. PowrDragn
PowrDragn at Pojo dot Com
|