Hey
all, it's been a while since I've
started writing here at Pojo, and
even longer since I've done an N.'s
End article. I guess I just haven't
been inspired or anything. Odd, I
know. But now I'm getting back to
things the way they used to, and I'm
going to start writing on things
other than decks.
The first thing
that I saw that really came to my
attention was on my recent trip out
of state for an event, in which for
the first time in a while, I was a
player again instead of a judge. I
guess it was nice seeing it from the
other end, but it got me thinking:
Do players really think about the
judge's role in a game like this?
That's really what I want to focus
on here, that side of the equation.
Every game has judges, but for the
most part, they're brushed off to
the side as necessary evils, the
things we need just to play, but
they serve an important role in the
game at the professional level. They
tell us what we can and can't do.
But people don't really see the
effort that goes into that,
expecting always correct rulings and
spot on timing from them. I've heard
many a tale of players complaining
that they lost due to judges, that
they weren't professional enough, or
other such problems. Yeah, if Mike
the judge didn't understand X card's
effect well enough, he shouldn't try
to make a ruling, but there are
times where you just have to go with
what you think is right. It won't
always be right, but it's what's
needed. Another thing I've been
seeing is a lack of respect for
judges.
Too often people meet one
bad judge and learn to hate them
all, seeing them as a pack of
cheaters and easily bribed tools,
even arguing with them and bullying
them to try and change a decision.
That kind of thing really sickens
me; they're out there for free
trying to help you play your game,
and you treat them like morons and
try to intimidate them. I'm not
saying it happens all the time, or
that anyone specifically does it,
but it leads to a problem of
authority and sportsmanship, a trait
that seems lacking in the players of
today. I do play around a lot of YGO
players though, so that's probably
not helping. There's a lot of
responsibility when you allow
yourself to judge a game, and I have
to admit, there are some people who
aren't up to the task. It's easy
enough to become a judge in this
game, but actually acting as one is
an entirely different thing, one
that should be treated with respect.
God knows that there's plenty of bad
judges out there like the ones that
you should fear, but I'd like to
think that they're in the minority.
For the most part, a judge is just
another player who decided to enjoy
the game in a different way. I
myself love Naruto, and with each
new set I get everything I need for
my deck and play around with it
(even heading to other shops when I
can), but I'm a judge before I'm a
player, and with that, I try my best
to keep on top of rulings, erratas,
and other such things. I'll still be
playing this game for a while, but
just like my players, I love this
game. The decline in sportsmanship
towards these people has been
bugging me for the longest time, and
it seems like it's not going to get
better as long as it goes unnoticed,
but myself personally hope that
players and judges can get along and
just enjoy the game that brought
them together in the first place.
Well, that's N.'s End. I'm hoping to
start doing these on a more regular
basis, mixing in deck fixes,
interviews with players and Bandai
staff, and other such things. Send
me an e-mail at n.jolly@ymail.com if
you have a deck you want looked over
(I'm going with block, so keep that
in mind), think you have a good
opinion to share about something
important, or think you can add
something to the articles. Until
then, I'm Mr. N. Jolly signing off!
|