Pojo's Yu-Gi-Oh! news, tips, strategies and more! | |||||
|
|||||
Card Game Featured Writers Releases + Spoilers Anime Video Games Other
Magic
This Space |
Trading
Card Game Tips from fans
Swiss Tourneys – First Round Losses- by Baneful
Most of the YGO tournaments out there are "Swiss" or
mostly Swiss-based.
It's basically a tournament that grades you
on your wins-losses rather than a pure elimination
knockout bracket tourney.
This is a very complex topic, but this
Wikipedia article explains it very well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss-system_tournament
The way my local shop does it is 4 rounds of Swiss
and then elimination from the top 8 scoring players.
Larger tournaments have 10 rounds of Swiss
and then top 16/32 elimination to accommodate the
large amount of players.
I like Swiss.
It lets you be judged by numerous rounds of
play rather than just 1 random match.
What if you use a graveyard deck and happen
to be paired against the one person who happens to
have a remove-from-play deck.
Swiss lets me be judged on my overall
capabilities not just one.
The one problem with Swiss though is losing in the
first round.
When I was a young kid at a tournament and I
saw the best players drop because they had lost in
round 1, I was confused.
"Why are you dropping?
You're one of the best players".
Fact is they knew that a round one loss would likely
keep them out of the top 3 (with prizes), so why
should they waste their time fighting for 4th
place?
In general, losing earlier hurts more than losing
later.
Later games are where the stratified spectrum of
players (from best to worst) is fully established.
Losers are paired with losers.
Winners are paired with winners.
In the later Swiss rounds, if you are paired against
a winner, it won't hurt your score as much because
you lost to a great player.
And let's say you do get a loss after winning
the first round, then you get a chance to fight
easier opponents that you're better able to win
against.
In round one, such strata isn't established yet.
If a really good player loses to an
inconsistent player round one, they are cut off from
facing the other winners.
And by playing against people who lost, you
don't have the potential for raising your score as
you do if you were to play against a winner.
Getting that loss in round 2 isn't as bad.
If you were to statistically compare a group
of 0-1 players after round 1 and 1-1 players after
round 2, it is likelier that the latter group
consists of overall better players.
1-1's prove they could win games and many of
them will likely move on to win more.
Sure, sometimes the 0-1 category consists of
great players, but most of the time it consists of
people who will be 0-4.
Defeating an 0-4 won't raise your score very high.
And it's all because you lost the first
round.
|
||||
Copyright© 1998-2014 pojo.com This site is not sponsored, endorsed, or otherwise affiliated with any of the companies or products featured on this site. This is not an Official Site. |