Pojo's Yu-Gi-Oh! news, tips, strategies and more! | |||||
|
|||||
Card Game Featured Writers Releases + Spoilers Anime Video Games Other
Magic
This Space |
Baneful's Column Ground-Zero Thinking
When I form an opinion,
whether in real-life or in Yugioh, I try
(whenever I can) to view matters as
objectively as I can.
I try to see things not just in terms
of how they affect me personally, but how
they function in reality (independent of how
I personally feel about it).
A long time ago people thought
the Earth was the center of the universe
just because it appeared that way from
direct view and people enjoyed the pride of
thinking the universe of revolving around
them.
But Aristotle and the church, were
both wrong because (regardless of how
prestigious they were) they weren’t thinking
at ground zero.
I’ll define what I mean.
Then, I’ll provide examples of how
this applies to Yugioh:
ˇ
Everything should be judged
based on current utility – not tradition.
ˇ
If a superior idea is
discovered, it should replace the existing
one.
ˇ
Just because an opinion is
popular doesn’t mean it is right.
ˇ
Hype, rumors, fads and trends
should be taken with a grain of salt until
they’re analyzed.
Example #1
All of my friends were raving
over the release of The Lost Millennium
because it was the first GX set, it had
Elemental Heroes and it had new shiny holos.
I saw the set list and determined
that most of the cards in it were actually
bad, and I was better off just buying a copy
of Brain Control than opening packs.
This happened likewise with Cyberdark
Impact and other dud sets.
Popularity dictated that these were
huge events, but my common sense told me
they weren’t.
Example #2
The ban list has numerous
cards banned which have not been overpowered
for several years.
Elemental Hero Stratos was banned
almost a decade ago back when an 1800 ATK
beatstick and a +1 search effect was very
powerful.
But nowadays we have several monsters
which essentially do the same thing, yet
they’re not in jail with Stratos.
Tribe-Infecting Virus is also banned,
despite the fact that it’s a 1-for-1
(possibly -1) that takes up a Normal Summon
and the complement card Sinister Serpent
received a harsh errata.
There was a time when Dark Armed
Dragon was at 3, yet a bunch of other much
less degenerate cards (released prior) were
still restricted to 1.
Example #3
Pot of Greed is a perfect
example of the willingness of people to
defend existing cards regardless of how
degenerate they are.
It was an effortless skill-less +1.
But many people reframed the question
to “Why should it not exist”.
Simply by already being there, people
had to have a strong reason to be against it
(regardless of there being no reason for it
in the first place).
If there were no Pot of Greed in
2005, would it have been so imperative to
have it that duelists all across the world
would ask Konami for it?
Not really.
But once the foot is in the door,
people tend to just tolerate anything unless
it’s really bad.
Once the other Goat era cards went,
the argument that much worse cards existed
was less powerful.
Example #4
Sometimes we add cards to our
deck based on wishful thinking rather than
utility.
For example, in 2003, logic dictated
that running Dark Magician was pointless
because Summoned Skull has the same ATK with
1 less tribute (but people ran Dark Magician
for emotional reasons: it’s a really cool
card).
During the Goat era, I was proud of a
holo Creature Swap I pulled so I ran it.
It wasn’t doing well for my deck, it
often clogged and the opponent chained Goats
to it.
I justified it by viewing a deck list
of a pro player with Creature Swap in it
(but his deck and strategy were different
than mine).
Eventually, my common sense dictated
that my personal experience with Creature
Swap had been repeatedly bad and running it
in that deck of mine wasn’t a good idea. |
||||
CopyrightŠ 1998-2017 pojo.com This site is not sponsored, endorsed, or otherwise affiliated with any of the companies or products featured on this site. This is not an Official Site. |