I just wanted to make a few brief follow-up points regarding the article yesterday.

1) Most of the circumstances regarding Cedric's bribe attempt came from a direct verbatim account from Cedric after he was disqualified. As a result of this, and upon further reviewing my article, I think the article was a bit biased against his opponent, John Hammond.

To John and those involved, I am deeply sorry about implying that you were at fault whatsoever in this situation. From the way this article was written, it might be implied that John did something wrong.

2) After Cedric sold his stuff and walked around the floor talking about his "banning," it was rather easy to mistakenly assume he was banned from future events instead of simply disqualified from the event. While he may indeed later be placed on the suspended player's list, that will be Upper Deck's decision completely.

Both he and I mistakenly assumed his disqualification automatically equaled a banning. Seeing as how he is not yet on the suspended player's list, the error was mine.

Thanks to those who have clarified these points, and once again congratulations to Legion Events and Upper Deck for a fantastically run Shonen Jump Championship.

Jae Kim is a creative contributor to Pojo.com. You may contact him (every e-mail will be answered) at JAELOVE@gmail.com. He can also be found contributing to the Message Boards and the Card of the Day.